By Birth & Baby University · Last updated: October 2026 · 7 min read
Community organizations are often the ones who notice that families in their area have no access to a doula, and that the people best placed to become doulas cannot afford the training. Some have answered by building their own funded training programs. There is no single model and no standard evaluation of what works, but there are documented examples, and the sources describe design lessons and pitfalls. This article reviews how such programs have been funded, what training and credentialing rules they have to fit, what supports keep new doulas working, and where the evidence stops.
Key takeaways
Quick answer: funding has come from state appropriations, federal workforce and health grants, local government contracts and health plan or corporate gifts. Programs that last tend to pair training money with support after training, such as help with billing, mentorship and hospital access. None of the sources reviewed here reports outcomes from a funded training cohort, so claims about effectiveness should be modest.
- Missouri appropriated $500,000 in fiscal year 2025 for a doula training program providing scholarships, and Oregon created a fund in 2025 with $1 million appropriated for fiscal year 2026 that can pay for training, billing support and recruitment.
- A Pennsylvania county health department contract describes a three-year, $600,000 project funded entirely by a U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration grant, to recruit and train new doulas, support their state certification and build a directory.
- State Medicaid training rules differ, and doulas of color interviewed in a federal commission study said some approved trainings are not community-based.
- Research does not tell us which training model produces the best outcomes: a 2026 review found insufficient information on how the type or intensity of doula support matters.

Where the money has come from
The Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center’s March 2026 brief groups state workforce supports into four buckets: doula collaboratives and hubs, financial support for training, doula-friendly hospital policies, and incorporating doula voice. Its examples of training finance include Missouri’s $500,000 for the Cora Faith Walker doula training program, which pays for training and certification fees, and Nevada’s loan repayment program, which offers state-certified doulas up to $15,000 over five years of service in underserved communities. Oregon’s 2025 fund makes grants to community-based organizations for training and education costs, insurance billing support and recruitment. The brief also notes that states are grappling with federal Medicaid funding cuts and that these options require state budget investment.
Other funders appear in the sources. A Delaware County, Pennsylvania health department announcement from October 2024 describes a contract to the Foundation for Delaware County for a three-year “Growing and Diversifying the Doula Workforce” project, grant-funded through the Employment and Training Administration of the U.S. Department of Labor at 100 percent of total costs, $600,000. The National Health Law Program’s best practices guide (last updated September 2026) lists a 2023 UnitedHealthcare donation of $150,000 to the New Mexico Doula Association to fund 22 training scholarships, Delaware Division of Public Health funding for multiple doula training programs, and other state, health plan and philanthropic examples, as ongoing or completed as of 2025. Funding programs open and close, so check current availability.

Fit the training to the rules that govern payment
Funded training is only as useful as the credential it leads to. The Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC) found in its 2023 case study that states use two general approaches, an approved list of programs or a set of core competencies, and that some allow experienced doulas to enroll through legacy or experience pathways. Overly prescriptive rules can make timely training hard. Minnesota required training through one of nine prescribed organizations or one designated by the commissioner, and Oregon was approving a “one-stop training program.” Some doulas of color interviewed told MACPAC that parts of state-approved training are not community-based or tailored to the needs of historically marginalized communities, and they advocated for more local and diverse training organizations. Some doula organizations in Oregon offered training designed to meet state requirements and connected new doulas to mentors who could help them attend the three initial births the state required.
A community organization planning a program should therefore start with the target state’s current rules and ask whether the planned curriculum is accepted, who delivers it and whether graduates can enroll as providers. Our article on how doulas become Medicaid providers describes the enrollment steps that follow.
What keeps graduates working
- Administrative support. MACPAC and the Prenatal-to-3 brief both describe doulas struggling without billing and credentialing support. New Jersey’s collaborative assisted with Medicaid billing, certification and state registration information, and connections to trainings, scholarships and mentorship, with $450,000 in state funding for the first year. NHeLP notes that the collaborative concluded in June 2024 and was transitioning to three regional hubs, which shows that such programs change over time.
- Hospital access. The Prenatal-to-3 brief describes Illinois and New Jersey requirements that hospitals have written policies allowing doulas to accompany patients, which affect whether graduates can do the work.
- Pay and burnout. The same brief reports that doulas report burnout due to being underpaid and underfunded, which leads to attrition. Training programs that ignore pay may lose graduates.
- Doula voice. Several states formed doula advisory councils or workgroups. A program that includes practicing doulas in design is more likely to match real needs.
What the evidence does not tell us
None of the sources reviewed here reports outcomes for a funded training cohort, such as completion, certification, enrollment, retention or client outcomes. The most relevant clinical evidence is limited too. Viswanathan and colleagues (2026) found insufficient information on the effects of varying intensity or types of doula support, and Groves and colleagues (2026) noted heterogeneity in doula training across studies. That means no source can say which curriculum or length produces better results for families. Organizations should present their training as workforce development grounded in community need, not as a proven way to improve outcomes.
What this means for doulas and organizations
- Define the target. Is the goal certification, Medicaid enrollment, placement with a program, or independent practice? Each needs different training and support.
- Budget beyond tuition. Include stipends for time, childcare, transportation, mentorship, background checks, insurance and billing support if funds allow.
- Plan for the end of grants. Describe how graduates will be paid after the funding ends.
- Keep scope clear. Training should teach non-medical support and referral, not clinical tasks.
- Build in evaluation. Track enrollment, completion, certification, Medicaid enrollment, retention and client reach, and report them honestly.
Putting it into practice
- Map the rules in your state: approved trainings, core competencies, registry listing, insurance or CPR requirements and enrollment steps.
- Talk to local doulas about what they would need to complete training, including cost, schedule and format.
- Identify two or three funder types, such as the state health department, local public health agencies and health plans, and ask each what outcomes they would want to see.
- Write a one-page plan covering recruitment, training provider, mentorship, billing support, hospital relationships and what happens at the end of the grant.
- Choose a small set of measures at the start and collect them from cohort one.
Limits and uncertainty
This article relies on policy briefs, a government announcement, an advocacy organization’s guide and a federal commission case study, not on evaluations. Funding programs and state rules change often, and the examples are as dated in the sources, from 2023 to 2026. No claim is made that any program improved outcomes. Funding can end or change form, as the New Jersey collaborative example in the sources illustrates.
The bottom line
Funded training can lower the cost barrier for people who would make strong doulas, and several states and local agencies have paid for it. Programs work best when they fit the state’s credentialing rules, include support after training and plan for the day the grant ends. The evidence on outcomes is not there yet, so build the evaluation in from the start.
Birth & Baby University’s For Doulas page outlines its online, self-paced birth and postpartum doula training, recertification and mentorship, and a path for agency owners. If your organization or the people you support are weighing training options, confirm with your state and funder which programs they accept.
This article is for professional education. It is not medical, legal, financial or tax advice. Check the standards of your certifying organization and the rules where you work.
Sources and further reading
- Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center. State Approaches to Supporting the Community-Based Doula Workforce (research brief, March 23, 2026). Read the source
- Delaware County Health Department. DCHD Perinatal Community Health Worker and Doula Program Awards (released October 1, 2024; page updated June 2026). Read the source
- Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission. Doulas in Medicaid: Case Study Findings (November 2023). Read the source
- Chen A. Best Practices for Medicaid Coverage of Doula Care. National Health Law Program, Doula Medicaid Project (last updated September 2026). Read the source
- Viswanathan M, Middleton JC, Sathe NA, et al. Doula support during pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology (2026). Read the source
- Groves P, Williams H, Salter CL, et al. Doula care and health outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA Network Open (2026). Read the source
More for professionals: the Professionals Blog.
Leave a Reply